NO! Trump has declared that over and over. Along with admonitions of “fake news.”

The truth is that the press of this country are the full-time keepers of the First Amendment — of the right to the truth. The people of the press are not always successful at telling the truth, sometimes because their sources lie to them, sometimes because they are not good enough at their craft, or sometimes because they can’t step beyond the personal agendas we all have. Journalists must try to suppress such bad behavior for the sake of truth and balance.

The press, too, are often the bearers of bad news, news we often don’t want to hear. But if we are to live full and honest lives, we deserve to have the truth available to us, even though sometimes we cannot bear to look.

Tonight, I watched a fairly new movie, “Shock and Awe,” the story produced by Carl Reiner of the Knight-Ridder newspaper chain’s lonely battle to tell the truth about the fast roll of the Bush Jr. administration into war in Iraq in 2003.  Virtually every other major media was seduced by high level spin that Iraq was heading into nuclear capability and that with a powerful stroke the U.S.could turn Iraq toward democracy and help defend Israel and turn the nation into an oil pump for our nation.

Of course, none of that was the truth, and Knight-Ridder alone revealed as much, though they were largely ignored by most. The reason they got it right, while other media did not? Knight-Ridder worked the story hard instead of relying on government press releases and relied on mid-level government sources for their info, and not the highest level of government that had an agenda, not based upon facts but upon political aspirations and blind vengeance.

The press, when they operate independently, serve to protect the interests of the people, even from the accidental or intentional malfeasance of the government they elect.

Advertisements

fullsizeoutput_7dc5

In search of new role for astronomy icon

Impending sale of Yerkes Observatory rattles Wis. towns

The University of Chicago plans to close the Yerkes Observatory on Oct. 1 and is weighing what to do with the property. In 2006, it was almost sold to a resort developer. (Courtney Pedroza/Chicago Tribune )

BY TED GREGORY

CHICAGO TRIBUNE

WILLIAMS BAY, Wis. — Lately, Dianna Colman is recognized and stopped almost everywhere she goes. Her phone buzzes, too, with calls from New York, Texas, Georgia and California, among other places.

But the reason for her celebrity is hardly glamorous. Colman and a few others have taken on the complicated task of trying to save the cherished and renowned Yerkes Observatory — birthplace of modern astronomy, home to a pair of Nobel laureates and now for sale.

“Trust me,” Colman said after walking through the building one recent afternoon, “everybody around here is just saying, ‘Now what? What are they going to do? How are they going to do it? When?’ It’s a little frustrating, but it’s part of the process.”

“They” are the leaders of the University of Chicago, which owns the 121-year-old observatory and an estimated 77 bucolic acres around it in southeast Wisconsin. But for decades, Yerkes has been obsolete as a cutting-edge research center.

In March, U. of C. announced the observatory will close on Oct. 1. For an undetermined period of time, the institution is considering offers for what to do with the property.

The university’s decision to sell ratcheted up anxiety in the five towns surrounding Geneva Lake, a region known as a getaway for Chicago-area residents and sprinkled with extremely affluent families that have vacationed in their opulent homes here for generations.

In Williams Bay, the tiny village where Yerkes is located, the pending sale is making people particularly antsy. A dozen years ago, the university agreed to sell the observatory to a resort developer, but that episode ended with hurt feelings and no deal.

This time, the university and local residents are trying to be more deliberate, respectful and transparent. Yet concerns are emerging about the university’s intentions.

The Yerkes’ grounds, designed by the legendary landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, include open lakefront footage on highly desirable Geneva Lake, and the observatory is so central to the region that its image is on Williams Bay’s village seal.

Distinctive and ornate, the building’s main feature is what’s touted as the world’s largest refractor telescope — with a 40-inch lens, 63-foot tube and total weight of 20 tons.

Carl Sagan and Edwin Hubble studied at Yerkes. Nobel laureates Gerhard Herzberg and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar worked there, and a third Nobel winner, James Cronin, was affiliated with Yerkes. Albert Einstein visited.

And, despite the university’s emphasis on more sophisticated reflecting telescope projects in Chile, Yerkes remains a welcoming educational and community center that offers tours, “star parties,” chances to look through the massive telescope, even astronomy programs for the blind.

Those who know Yerkes well say its wooded, parklike setting has an almost magical capacity to stir passion for astronomy and all sciences.

“We’ve loved it long enough,” Colman said, “that we figure it must belong to us by now.”

‘Enormous pushback,’ but ‘no secret plan’

The Geneva Lake area being what it is, the group Colman leads includes people with influence, education, experience and acumen. A retired McDonald’s executive, a former university executive vice president, a trial attorney, a psychiatrist and Colman, a Harvard MBA who worked in corporate finance, are the core of the Yerkes Future Foundation.

Packed rooms at public hearings underscore locals’ affection for Yerkes and the ambience of Williams Bay, a town of about 2,600 that three decades ago blocked a proposed golf course, townhouse, condo and convention center plan by purchasing the 230-acre site.

Williams Bay converted it to the Kishwauketoe Nature Conservancy.

The village could borrow money to buy the Yerkes property, trustee Jim D’Alessandro said. But “there’s little to zero support for doing that” primarily because maintenance of the property alone could total $400,000 to $800,000 a year, said D’Alessandro, who is also president of the Williams Bay Business Association.

At one of those packed public meetings shortly after U. of C. announced Yerkes’ closing, trustee Marsha Engquist reminded university Executive Vice President David Fithian of a “long, arduous process that hurt painfully.”

She was referring to the university’s surprise announcement in 2006 that it had agreed to sell 45 acres of Yerkes land for about $9 million to a New York developer that planned to build a 100-room hotel and 72 homes. The agreement also called for preserving Yerkes and 30 acres around it, creating a conservation zone along the lake and providing more than $400,000 a year to support the observatory, in addition to several million dollars for educational outreach at Yerkes.

But “enormous community pushback” erupted over the university announcing an agreement without public input, said Charles Ebeling, a Yerkes Future Foundation member and retired McDonald’s executive. Residents also were angry with the anticipated traffic increases and changes to the property. In short order, the proposal died.

“We’ve reviewed that history carefully,” Fithian said at the public meeting in March. “We understand mistakes that were made and believe we’ve learned lessons. I want to assure you that we genuinely have no plan in place, no secret plan. There are no sidebar conversations happening. We’re trying to do better this time.”

U. of C. has created a Yerkes Updates website, where it reports that from April to mid-June, the university sought “expressions of interest” for the Yerkes land that balance “the current facilities and continued public programming with responsible financial stewardship of the property assets.”

The university also reserved the right to consider offers after mid-June.

Discussions about any such proposals will be confidential, the university stated, but the institution plans “ongoing engagement with the village board” while evaluating proposals. “What we hear will help guide the decision-making process,” the university stated on the website.

School officials declined interviews and wouldn’t discuss the number, type or origin of proposals they’ve received.

In an email, university spokesman Jeremy Manier said the institution has “been in touch with the (village) board periodically” and “will have more to discuss on the transition timeline in August.”

Weddings at the observatory?

So far, U. of C. has been “a class act, very responsive and helpful” to work with, Colman said. But dealing with a large entity that deliberates so long on each of the foundation’s questions has been “very cumbersome,” she added.

Engquist, the local trustee, is less pleased. She said the university has failed to share information with the village, which she called “a conundrum that doesn’t bode well.” She also criticized the university for leaving what she considered insufficient time to find a new Yerkes owner.

“I think their timing sucks,” she said.

Publicly, village trustees avoid expressing a preferred plan for Yerkes, a position that earned the board grief in a local editorial, which expressed fear that the village will be “steamrolled by some developer or other business concern that looks at Yerkes and sees only dollar signs.”

The preference of the Yerkes Future Foundation, which formed weeks after the observatory’s announced closing, is for the property to become an educational outreach and research center, as well as an event space for weddings and other functions, Colman said.

Whether those uses could sustain Yerkes is debatable. Ebeling and others say upward of $20 million would be needed to purchase the land and observatory and upgrade it. He added that “many local residents, either by themselves or with a few of their neighbors, could take care of this situation.”

“We wouldn’t be messing around if we didn’t think we could do it,” he added, “but I’m not writing the check to take care of it.”

Village President Bill Duncan noted that building on the property’s lakefront would be complicated by its slope and location in an environmentally protected corridor.

Also, Duncan said, residents have made it clear that any plan to build a dense residential development on the property “isn’t going to fly.”

Local resident Nathan Bond, a retired Army lieutenant colonel, said he would support development on the Yerkes property, if the observatory and land that immediately surrounds it would be preserved.

Construction of single-family, detached homes might generate tax revenue to preserve and maintain the core of Yerkes, he said. Bond added that he doesn’t like the idea of building on the site but he is “desperate to see it preserved.”

“It’s a complex situation, and it requires a complex solution where probably no one would be totally happy in the end,” Bond said. “That’s how compromises work.”

Residents, he said, must decide what the essential elements of their community are.

Duncan said he expects to hear the university’s ideas for the property around mid-July.

tgregory@chicagotribune.com

Twitter @tgregoryreports

https://www.wgtd.org/playlist/community-matters/community-matters-060218

 

P1010414

our Great Apple Oak awakes to summer

Contact: Chuck Ebeling

262-581-6229 ceebeling@hotmail.com

 

Press Points – Saving Yerkes Observatory– May 2, 2018

 

  1. A new foundation, the Yerkes Future Foundation (YFF), today sent an “Expression of Interest” letter to David Chiaro, associate VP of the University of Chicago, indicating that concerned citizens of the Geneva Lake areas have come together as a cohesive organization with the desire to work with the university regarding the transfer of ownership of Yerkes Observatory, including its contents and associated land. The university had previously announced it plans to close Yerkes on Oct. 1, 2018 and is open to proposals regarding its future.

 

  1. The chair of YFF is Dianna Colman, a local Geneva Lake area resident, who heads a group of founding members.

 

  1. It was on this day 125 years ago that the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893 opened, and one of the displays was the revolutionary new 40-inch telescope – then and now the world’s largest operating through-the-lens telescope – which would be installed at the new Yerkes Observatory near the shores of Geneva Lake, Wisconsin, in 1897.

 

 

  1. The goals of YFF are to preserve the historic features of both the observatory building and the site and at the same time make the facility open to the public, available for youth development and continuing education as a science center.

 

  1. A public meeting is planned by YFF to introduce and discuss its Expression of Interest, to be held Monday, May 14, at George Williams College of Aurora University, at Williams Bay, Wisconsin, at 7 pm in the Seabury Room in Beasley Campus Center.

 

  1. This proposal is being made by YFF “with a genuine concern for all aspects of the Yerkes entity but also with a deep respect for the Village of Williams Bay, its citizenry, the greater Geneva Lake community and the future, science, astronomy and architectural students who will benefit from the open and enhanced environment of Yerkes Observatory.”

 

 

  1. The YFF believes an endowment of at least 10 to 15 million dollars will be needed to preserve and operate the observatory, depending on deferred capital expenses necessary to have the building and grounds meet minimum standards.

 

  1. The YFF encourages the University of Chicago to give their proposal prompt and thoughtful consideration and looks forward to entering a dialog with the university leading to a good result.

4062701932_59b0acdc52_m The University of Chicago has, once again after 13 years, decided to close famed Yerkes Observatory, the birthplace of American astrophysics and still home to the world’s largest operating lens type telescope. The University’s previous effort to shut down Yerkes began in 2005, when the college announced they planned to sell Yerkes to Mirbeau, an eastern resort company, for $10 million, to build a spa/resort on the lakefront Yerkes property and homes around the observatory main complex. The fate of the observatory structure and its contents were left up in the air.

The Lake Geneva community rose up at the prospective desecration of this beloved historical cradle of American astronomy, that includes the last 550 feet of undeveloped shoreland on the 26-mile circumference, spring-fed Lake Geneva, as well as acres of adjacent heavily wooded, steep land that had remained untouched for 120 years, since the university acquired it.

The uproar from the lakes community, university alumni, the news media and astronomy fans across the globe was so strong that by 2007 UC withdrew from their contract with Mirbeau, and agreed to continue to operate and invest in Yerkes as an astro-science education facility. Then just a few weeks ago,  the university issued a news release saying that it once again plans to permanently close the doors at Yerkes, on October 1, 2018. Their subsequent plans for the observatory and its full 77-acre site are yet unknown. They have indicated they are open to proposals, though no potential terms have yet been announced. The local community is gathering forces and planning what steps to take to preserve this legendary stairway to the stars.

Yerkes Observatory opened the world’s eyes to the wonders of the universe, and the long lenses that still play across the night skies continue to have the capacity to open the minds of young people everywhere to new possibilities. Hopefully, the great university and the community that has been home to Yerkes for 120 years will use that long perspective to pave the way to an even brighter future for Yerkes, the great stargazer.

apple.news/Avf7ioM-7TRak1vf_AC2Pxg

Yesterday, the University of Chicago, in a terse, surprise announcement, said that it intends to permanently cease operations and close historic Yerkes Observatory, which it has owned and operated since 1897. The closure is planned for October this year. It is where black holes were discovered and is one of the world’s original astrophysical laboratories, and home to what is still the world’s largest refracting telescope, the great 40-incher.

The complete news release from the University of Chicago is below.

This news apparently came as a total surprise to the staff and faculty at the observatory, located near Lake Geneva’s north shore in Williams Bay. About 10 years ago, the university sold the observatory and its approximately 80-acre lakeside site to a resort developer. The lake community, which prides itself on the conservation of natural lands and water through the region, and for which the observatory is virtually its trademark to both residents and tourists, rose up, and with the influence of university alumni and the news media, convinced the university to cancel that sale and continue operations, reinvesting in the facility and evolving from a focus on astronomical research to education.

What will become of the famed facility and its staff and faculty? No one yet knows.

Is it possible the university might donate or sell the observatory and its valuable site, which includes that last 550 feet of undeveloped shoreline on Lake Geneva, to some not-for-profit organization to operate as a museum, research or education center? Such candidates might include the observatory’s next door neighbor on the lake, George Williams College (an operation of Aurora University in Illinois), or the University of Wisconsin, or the Wisconsin Historical Society (which owns and operates the Black Point estate across the lake), or the Adler Planetarium in Chicago, or the Village of Williams Bay, or the Geneva Lake Museum?

Whatever course evolves, this grand architectural and scientific institution, which has been maintained in excellent condition for more than a century deserves resurrection and a place in the Lake Geneva area’s future, not just its past. What is needed is big thinking, that is as grand as the observatory and the universe it was built to explore. If developing that vision needs a hand, perhaps the world’s largest refracting telescope can help.

News Release from the University of Chicago:

UChicago activities at Yerkes Observatory to end in 2018

The University of Chicago has announced plans to wind down its activities at Yerkes Observatory in Williams Bay, Wis., over the next six months and to formally cease on-site operations by Oct. 1, 2018.

The upcoming summer season will therefore be the final season of University activities at Yerkes. The University is announcing the plans well in advance in order to engage with Yerkes staff and nearby communities, including the village of Williams Bay, in considering long-term plans for the property.

Despite its important history, the Yerkes facility and its instrumentation no longer contribute directly to the research mission of the University of Chicago, which has made major investments in the Magellan and Giant Magellan telescopes in Chile. Yerkes has continued to make important contributions through its education and outreach programs, and that work, which remains important to the University, will now relocate to the Hyde Park campus.

“Science at Yerkes in the 20th century led to key discoveries and advances in the field of astronomy, when the observatory helped build the foundation for modern astrophysics,” said Edward (Rocky) Kolb, dean of the Division of the Physical Sciences and a professor in the Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics. “It is an important part of the history of the University, and we hope it will become, in some form, a valuable resource to the surrounding community and visitors to the Lake Geneva area.”

Since the observatory was established by the University in 1897, it has been the home of groundbreaking work by scientists such as George Ellery Hale, Edwin Hubble and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar. The facility was the home of UChicago’s Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics from the time it opened until it began relocating to Hyde Park in the 1960s. In recent decades, the University’s research in observational astronomy has shifted to using facilities located all over the globe and in space.

The University and staff at Yerkes will honor existing commitments for events at the facility scheduled before Oct. 1, and will accept new bookings on a case-by-case basis.

“Unfortunately, operating Yerkes no longer makes sense for the University from a programmatic or cost standpoint. Drawing to a close our operations there is the first step in a collaborative process to determine the ultimate disposition of the buildings and property,” said David Fithian, executive vice president of the University. “We currently have no specific plans nor have we approached any potential buyers.”

Derek Douglas, vice president for civic engagement and external affairs, will represent the University in discussing options with the leadership of Williams Bay and its residents starting this month.

 

The current falderall over laxity in White House security clearances for the President’s son-in-law,  private secretary and speech writer make sense, because we can’t have people who are handling some of the most secretive and sensitive information of our nation being subject to blackmail or other pressure because of undisclosed weaknesses in their background or character. That is why our government has security clearances in the first place. And it is also why it is inconceivable that exceptions have been made at the highest level of that government.

I had a personal experience with security clearance when I was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Army just over 50 years ago. I went straight from college graduation into a 10-month Army training program to become an officer, and was immediately assigned to be a staff officer at the headquarters of the Army War College in bucolic Carlisle, Pennsylvania. A couple of months into service there, an Army security agency officer from D.C. showed up to interview me in conjunction with the Secret security clearance required for my posting.

It turned out that the security officer had attended high school with me, though we never had been friends. He had one concern. It turned out he found a record of a prank that my college roommate and I had been involved with several years before. He relished making me explain what was the very silly and unexplainable behavior that got us into trouble.

After the inquisition into a college prank, I got my Secret clearance, and went on as a staff officer at the military’s highest bastion of learning, and also became the public affairs officer for the Army’s nuclear emergency team for the American northeast, and later served as a public affairs officer in Vietnam and was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for similar service in Chicago.

My point is this: the Army took very seriously the investigation related to a low-level security clearance for a new second lieutenant, a half-century ago. And now we have this kurfluffel over repeated lax security investigations at the highest level in the Trump White House. What gives? How are we, the people, supposed to have confidence in our current government leadership, when these high-level people don’t seem to get a fraction of the security oversight given to the lowest level officer in the Army 50 years ago?

July 2018
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 614 other followers

Advertisements