The disconnect between the rhetoric of government, especially the Federal government, and the life and prospects of ordinary Americans is a vast chasm. The poor and working poor grow poorer. The rich and super rich grow richer, flaunting their political influence, wealth and extravagant lifestyles, provoking those less clever and lucky. The un-necessary wars go on and on, and cost more and more in lives and treasure, while the government refuses to restrain the military industrial complex or engage the 99% of the untouched population by risking a draft or war taxes. The Left/right political process is broken, yet hangs on because of fear of change, fear of disrupting the obsolete political norm, and fixing things like the dangerous Electoral College process for electing Presidents, where a vote in Alaska is worth 6 times more than a vote in Chicago, or the Senate that leaves us with lopsided representation that is geographic instead of population-centered. And let’s look at the ramifications of the decay of standards in education, and loss of general civility throughout society. All of that, together with inflammatory rhetoric emanating from some of our politicians and what used to be the news media, leaves little doubt that some of those on the fringe of mental stability might resort to acts of brutal terror to gain attention or express their utter frustration with society. Thus it is not surprising that Tucson happened, but that it doesn’t happen more often. The remedies, or at least the most glaring opportunities for remedy, are implied in the shortcomings I’ve just summarized. Was Tucson but a violent expression of a latent madness which ultimately infects us all.
My posts
- January 2022
- May 2020
- March 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
Join 1,946 other subscribers
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 10, 2011 at 10:54
Margaret Ebeling
What a poignant statement. Your mention of a broken education system is in my opinion the significant issue; if we cannot resolve or advance (personally) important issues with discussion and negotiation because of sheer inability to do so, then the dialog potentially shifts to emotional and even violent action and reaction, as we have seen here.
Other than the obvious tragedy with Congresswoman Giffords and the many innocent victims in Tucson, there is another dangerous result of this shooting. Our Congresspeople will simply change the way they do business when dealing with the public and their constituents. They need to ensure their personal safety and as such, will physically isolate themselves from those that they have been voted to represent. At a time when citizens already feel disconnected from their government officials, the gap will widen and more likely than not, these officials will be forced to make decisions where the public has not had the opportunity to participate in the formation of laws. Talk about adding a layer towards party polarization to boot!
I would like to think that we will be able to reach our representatives via well-worded and concise written correspondence because we have collectively blown it now to do so face to face. And to bring it full circle – are we providing a level or standard of education to our next generation to allow and encourage them to draft such a statement and contribute in a meaningful way?
January 10, 2011 at 11:06
applewoody
Yes, education is part of the answer, and the long-term hope for future generations. And more immediately, the potential for increased isolation of Congressional leadership from the general population (but not from financial supporters and lobbyists), is a real concern too.