After your additional comments and analysis, I’m even more concerned that the “Oath Department” at the Pentagon is asleep at the switch. If innocents like my old high school friend, you and I can detect these obvious incongruities, one wonders how we can trust the military to know whether the next drone target to kill is going to be a terrorist militant or a school marm. Obviously, we can’t! Our technological capabilities seem to be over-reaching our human ethics and intelligence capacity, and we are breeding the next generation of America-haters among the collateral damage.
Chuck
From a friend: I’ve been doing too much proof-reading lately.
Actually, the two oaths are completely different. Officers indicate their rank in the first line, enlisted only their name. Then they are different again after the phrase “true faith and allegiance to the same”, with even more implications than you imputed, although I agree with your thoughts. Both swear to support and defend, but officers take the oath without reservation and will “well and faithfully discharge” their duties. Enlisted personnel have no such obligation. They only agree to obey orders. They can be shirkers, evaders, draftees, in short: cannon fodder. At least they both agree to do it with God’s help at the end.
The variance seems to me to imply a completely different world-view. The officer’s oath is about mind-set and belief and ability; there is no mention of following orders or even agreeing with them. The enlisted is about following orders, no thought desired. We could both go on at length about the implications of that.
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 6, 2013 at 12:04
cataract eye drops
During the Revolutionary War, the Continental Congress established different oaths for the enlisted men of the Continental Army.
February 6, 2013 at 20:57
politicaldanny
For my opinion go here
http://politicaldanny.wordpress.com/2013/02/07/justice-department-memo-drone-strikes-on-americans-are-legal/
February 11, 2013 at 14:50
Carolyn L. Espinoza
The all mighty popular question that a lot of people have. I have my opinion on what is harder. I only know about the Marines and I think OCS is harder. two 6 week sessions or one 10 week and then 6 months at TBS. It way more mentally tough, and the physical standards are way higher. To get into OCS you need to do about 16 pull ups, 100 situps in 2 minutes and a 21:00 minute 3 mile run. But I want your guy’s opinions, especially the Marines out there. What is harder? Give some good explanations too. And are there any enlisted personal that crossed over to the officer side and went through both sides of training?